Home Comparisons Manatal vs JazzHR
Updated February 2026

Manatal vs JazzHR: Affordable ATS Battle

AI-powered modern ATS vs established budget-friendly option. Which wins for small teams?

Read Full Reviews

⚡ Quick Verdict

Choose Manatal if:

  • ✓ You want AI-powered features
  • ✓ Social media recruiting matters
  • ✓ Modern UI is important
  • ✓ You're tech-forward startup

Choose JazzHR if:

  • ✓ You're US-based (better support)
  • ✓ Want proven, stable platform
  • ✓ Budget is super tight ($49/mo)
  • ✓ Traditional hiring process
Feature Manatal JazzHR
Best For Modern Startups US Small Businesses
Starting Price $19/user/mo $49/mo (flat)
AI Features ★★★★★ None
Candidate Pipeline ★★★★★ ★★★★☆
Social Recruiting ★★★★★ ★★★☆☆
Job Posting ★★★★☆ ★★★★★
Ease of Use ★★★★★ ★★★★☆
Reporting ★★★★☆ ★★★★☆
Customer Support ★★★☆☆ ★★★★☆
Mobile App ★★★★☆ ★★★☆☆
CRM Features ★★★★★ ★★☆☆☆
Free Trial ✓ 14 days ✓ 21 days
Our Score 4.5 4.3

Affordable ATS Options

Both Manatal and JazzHR serve small businesses who can't afford Greenhouse ($15k/year) or Lever ($10k/year). They're in the $600-2,400/year range—much more accessible.

Manatal (founded 2017, Thailand-based) is the new kid with AI-powered candidate ranking, social recruiting, and modern design. It's popular with international startups and tech companies.

JazzHR (founded 2009, US-based) is the established budget ATS with solid features, good US support, and pricing that works for 1-5 person recruiting teams.

Core Features Both Share

Both handle the ATS basics well. Differences are in modern features and target markets.

When Manatal Wins

AI-Powered Candidate Ranking

Manatal's killer feature: AI that scores and ranks candidates automatically:

You post a job, 100 people apply, Manatal ranks them by fit. You interview the top 10. JazzHR doesn't have AI—you manually review every resume.

Social Recruiting & Enrichment

Manatal pulls candidate data from social profiles:

You can build a candidate database from LinkedIn, tag people, and reach out later. JazzHR is more traditional (job boards only).

Built-In CRM

Manatal includes candidate relationship management:

Like Lever's CRM but at a fraction of the cost. JazzHR doesn't have CRM features.

Modern, Beautiful UI

Manatal's interface is sleek and modern—feels like a 2025 product. Kanban-style pipeline, drag-and-drop, quick actions. It's intuitive and fast.

JazzHR's UI is functional but dated—feels like 2015 software.

Better Mobile App

Manatal's mobile app (iOS/Android) is full-featured. Review candidates, schedule interviews, collaborate with team—all from your phone.

JazzHR's mobile app is more limited.

Global-Friendly

Manatal supports multiple languages, currencies, and international job boards. Great if you're hiring across APAC, Europe, or Latin America.

JazzHR is US-centric (though it works internationally).

When JazzHR Wins

Lower Entry Price

JazzHR's Hero plan: $49/month flat fee (unlimited users, 1 active job).

Manatal's cheapest: $19/user/month (2-user minimum = $38/month, but still per-user).

For a 1-2 person recruiting team hiring occasionally, JazzHR is cheaper.

Flat-Rate Pricing (Scales Better)

JazzHR pricing:

Once you're on Plus, you can add recruiters without cost increases. Manatal charges per-user, so a 5-person recruiting team costs $95-150/month.

Better Job Board Integrations

JazzHR has deeper integrations with US job boards:

Manatal posts to boards too, but JazzHR's partnerships are stronger (especially for US companies).

US-Based Support

JazzHR support team is in the US (Pittsburgh, PA). Email, phone, chat. Response times are fast. They understand US hiring nuances (EEOC, I-9, etc.).

Manatal support is offshore (Asia time zones). Good but slower for US customers. Some complaints about responsiveness.

Proven Stability

JazzHR has been around since 2009—it's mature, stable, bug-free. Thousands of US SMBs use it.

Manatal is newer (2017) and ambitious. Occasional bugs reported. Fast-moving product (pro/con).

Better for Traditional Recruiting

If you're posting jobs to boards, screening resumes, and interviewing—JazzHR's workflow is straightforward and effective.

Manatal's AI and social features are overkill if you just need a basic ATS.

Pricing Deep Dive

Manatal Costs

2 users on Professional: $38/month = $456/year
5 users on Professional: $95/month = $1,140/year

JazzHR Costs

Hero (1 job): $588/year
Plus (unlimited): $2,868/year

Cost Comparison

For small teams hiring occasionally:

For active recruiting teams:

JazzHR is better for larger recruiting teams. Manatal is better for small, tech-savvy teams.

Real Customer Feedback

Manatal

Pros: AI is impressive, beautiful UI, great for startups, social recruiting is powerful, modern features
Cons: Support can be slow (time zones), occasional bugs, learning curve for AI features

G2 Rating: 4.7/5 | Capterra: 4.6/5

JazzHR

Pros: Affordable, reliable, good US support, easy to use, proven platform
Cons: Dated UI, no AI, limited CRM, mobile app is basic

G2 Rating: 4.4/5 | Capterra: 4.4/5

Who Should Choose What?

Choose Manatal if you're:

Choose JazzHR if you're:

What About Free Options?

If $50/month is still too much:

The Bottom Line

Choose Manatal if:

You want AI-powered recruiting at an affordable price. Social recruiting and CRM matter. You're a modern, tech-forward startup. Design and UX are important. You're hiring globally or outside the US.

Choose JazzHR if:

You're a US small business needing a reliable, affordable ATS. Budget is super tight. You have a larger recruiting team (flat pricing wins). You value US-based support. Traditional job board recruiting is your focus.

Our honest take: Manatal is more innovative and modern—great for startups and international teams. JazzHR is more practical and proven—great for traditional US SMBs. Both are solid budget options.

Try Manatal

Best for AI-powered recruiting

Start Free Trial →

Try JazzHR

Best for budget-friendly ATS

Start Free Trial →

Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no cost to you. Disclosure

Related Comparisons